The Effect of Deployment on Pulmonary Function in Military Personnel With Asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Military personnel with a diagnosis of asthma report increased respiratory symptoms in the deployment and post-deployment periods. The long-term effect of deployment on pulmonary function in this population is unknown. This study sought to determine the effect of deployment on post-deployment pulmonary function in active duty military personnel with asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of active duty military personnel with deployment to southwest Asia and an ICD-9 diagnosis of asthma with documented pre- and post-deployment spirometry was performed. RESULTS: A total of 642 active duty individuals with a diagnosis of asthma and documented spirometry with deployment to southwest Asia between 2006 and 2015 were identified. Of these, 76 individuals were identified with pre- and post-deployment spirometry. There was no significant change in the post-deployment forced expiratory volume at 1 second (% predicted), from 86.0 ± 14.8 to 87.6 ± 14.4 (P = .30). There was no significant change in post-deployment forced vital capacity (% predicted), from 93.8 ± 12.4 to 94.9 ± 12.1 (P = .42). The absolute change in forced expiratory volume at 1 second (L) after bronchodilator administration was decreased from pre-deployment to post-deployment (+0.31 ± 0.26 to +0.16 ± 0.23; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant post-deployment change in spirometry in this military population with asthma deployed to southwest Asia. These findings suggest that deployment itself is not associated with any short-term deleterious effect on post-deployment spirometric measures of lung function in many military personnel with asthma.

Clinical Evaluation of Deployed Military Personnel With Chronic Respiratory Symptoms: Study of Active Duty Military for Pulmonary Disease Related to Environmental Deployment Exposures (STAMPEDE) III.

BACKGROUND: Chronic respiratory symptoms are frequently reported after Southwest Asia deployment in support of combat operations. The full spectrum of clinical lung diseases related to these deployments is not well characterized. METHODS: Military personnel with chronic symptoms, primarily exertional dyspnea, underwent a standardized cardiopulmonary evaluation at two tertiary medical centers. Pulmonary function testing consisted of spirometry, lung volume, diffusing capacity, impulse oscillometry, and bronchodilator testing. Further testing included methacholine challenge, exercise laryngoscopy, high-resolution CT scan, ECG, and transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: A total of 380 participants with a mean age of 38.5 ± 8.4 years completed testing. Asthma was the most common diagnosis in 87 patients (22.9%) based on obstructive spirometry/impulse oscillometry and evidence of airway hyperreactivity, whereas another 57 patients (15.0%) had reactivity with normal spirometry. Airway disorders included 25 (6.6%) with laryngeal disorders and 16 (4.2%) with excessive dynamic airway collapse. Interstitial lung disease was identified in six patients (1.6%), whereas 11 patients (2.9%) had fixed obstructive lung disorders. Forty patients (10.5%) had isolated pulmonary function abnormalities and 16 (4.2%) had miscellaneous disorders. The remaining 122 patients (32.1%) with normal studies were classified as undiagnosed exertional dyspnea. Significant comorbidities identified included elevated BMI > 30 kg/m2 (34.2%), smoking (36.4%), positive allergy testing (43.7%), sleep apnea (38.5%), and esophageal reflux (13.6%). Mental health disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder were likewise common. CONCLUSIONS: Postdeployment pulmonary evaluation should focus on common diseases, such as asthma and airway hyperreactivity, and include testing for upper airway disorders. Diffuse lung diseases were rarely diagnosed, whereas numerous comorbidities were common.